Eyesores And Personal Freedom
Eyesores And Personal Freedom
To the Editor:
First Selectman Rosenthalâs desire to enact a so-called âEyesore Ordinanceâ is a bad idea for the property owners of Newtown, and Americans in general.
I favor individuals and/or companies with unsightly, dilapidated buildings and land to take personal responsibility for cleaning up that property. However, it should not be the governmentâs role to bully people into doing so with written or verbal warnings, and then if they donât cooperate to financially penalize them by taking invasive action.
An âEyesore Ordinanceâ is just another way of taking citizensâ personal freedoms away. How far would such an ordinance be taken? A building or a property that may seem appropriate to one person could in turn appear to be aesthetically unpleasing to another. To date, there are too many laws and ordinances that strip individualsâ personal freedoms on the federal, state and local law books. Mr Rosenthal, donât add another one.
Christopher Karpenko
6 Hattertown Road, Newtown                                    June 29, 2001