Date: Fri 17-Jul-1998
Date: Fri 17-Jul-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: CURT
Quick Words:
car-insurance-rates-business
Full Text:
Study: Insurers Making Big Profits From Connecticut Auto Insurance
HARTFORD (AP) -- Connecticut drivers should be paying up to 15 percent less
for automobile insurance because companies are making big profits, according
to a study released last week.
"High rates have hurt all drivers -- urban and suburban -- helping only to
swell industry profits," said Richard Blumenthal, Connecticut's attorney
general, who commissioned the study.
Conducted by an insurance industry expert, the study analyzed companies'
profit margins and how much they have paid out in claims since 1996. The study
recommends a 5.9 percent to 15 percent reduction in rates.
The study also recommends that insurance premiums focus on a driver's record
rather than where a driver lives. City dwellers pay more for insurance than
similar drivers who live in the suburbs.
"The high urban auto insurance rates are particularly punishing when it is
considered that the cities have higher concentrations of poor than do other,
less urban municipalities," the study said.
Connecticut motorists pay an average of $899 a year for insurance, the
fifth-highest rate in the nation. At the same time, motorists in Bridgeport,
Hartford and New Haven pay an average of about $1,100 a year.
Blumenthal said he commissioned the study because of complaints from consumers
and mayors of several large cities about high rates.
"The rates should be lowered because Connecticut drivers have been helping the
companies, which are making big bucks nationally, to even larger profit
margins in this state," said J. Robert Hunter, a former Texas insurance
commissioner who conducted the study. Hunter, a consumer advocate, is now
director of insurance for the Consumer Federation of America.
In 1996, companies offering private passenger auto insurance in Connecticut
posted profits of 17 percent, compared to the nationwide average of 12.1
percent. A year later, profits rose to 21.5 percent, Hunter said. The target
profit margin for the companies is 15 percent at most, and a 5.9 percent rate
reduction would bring profit back into that range, he said.
Hunter said one of the reasons companies are making large profits is the aging
population of baby-boomers, which results in safer driving and fewer
accidents. Also, better brakes, air bags and safer cars have cut down
injuries.
Insurance companies also are better at detecting fraud and are cashing in on
the stock market, using premiums to invest and reap the benefits of the
booming economy, he said.
Safer driving and better technology have led companies to pay less and less in
claims compared to their premiums. In 1997, the top 10 insurance groups in
Connecticut paid out 55.7 percent of their premiums, compared to 62.8 percent
paid out across the country.
Hunter recommended state officials hold hearings about insurance rates to ask
companies how they set rates. Also, city residents should be offered the
chance to pool their buying power to find lower, group rates.
George Reider Jr., Connecticut's insurance commissioner, said companies
already have taken part in public forums. Also, he said, the state has
published a brochure that compares rates which have, on average, fallen by 2.8
percent.
Reider said 63 more companies are selling auto insurance in the state than
three years ago.
"It's never been more competitive in the state's history, in my opinion," he
said. "In this market [consumers] can save money. We've done everything in our
power to try to encourage people in that regard."