Date: Fri 21-Aug-1998
Date: Fri 21-Aug-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
police-Lysaght-evaluation
Full Text:
Police Commission Evaluates Chief, But Won't Reveal Its Conclusions
BY ANDREW GOROSKO
Police Commission members Tuesday night met at a special closed session for
their annual evaluation of Police Chief James E. Lysaght, Jr's job
performance.
Although the Police Commission is a five-member panel, only three commission
members met to evaluate the chief's past performance and set job goals for him
for the coming year.
At the meeting were Chairman Robert Connor, Jr, Vice Chairman Carol Mattegat
and James Reilly. Commission members excused Chief Lysaght from the session,
after which he left Town Hall South and went home. Municipal employees
typically are present at their job evaluations.
Commission member William Meyer did not attend the meeting, and there is a
vacancy on the panel created by the recent resignation of Gerald Frawley.
Asked to disclose the results of Chief Lysaght's job evaluation, Mr Connor
declined to do so Thursday morning. Mr Reilly also declined to discuss the
matter. Mr Connor said Chief Lysaght and First Selectman Herbert Rosenthal
will receive copies of the chief's job evaluation.
Mr Connor said he does not plan to have any discussion of the chief's
evaluation at upcoming Police Commission meetings.
"We voted on it. It's a done deal. If the chief doesn't like it, that's his
problem," Mr Connor said.
"We're trying to do what's right for the taxpayers of Newtown," Mr Connor
said.
Mrs Mattegat declined to provide any specifics on the evaluation. Doing so
would be unfair to the chief, she said, noting that he was not present at the
evaluation and is not aware of its contents.
Mrs Mattegat declined to say whether the evaluation found the chief's job
performance to be the same, better, or worse than it was as described in the
evaluation performed on him last year. That evaluation by the Police
Commission, which was obtained by the police union through the state's Freedom
of Information process, gave the chief generally negative marks.
In a vote of confidence on the police chief conducted by the police union last
September, almost all union members who voted indicated a vote of "no
confidence" in Chief Lysaght, criticizing his management style.
Contradicting comments by Mr Connor, Mrs Mattegat said the evaluation done
Tuesday night will be discussed with Chief Lysaght at the Police Commission's
next regularly scheduled meeting September 1. In such cases, the person being
evaluated has the option of having the evaluation discussed in open or closed
session.
When asked about the results of Tuesday's night's evaluation of himself, Chief
Lysaght had no comment on the matter. He referred questions to Mr Rosenthal.
Mr Rosenthal said Wednesday he was not aware of the results. "I don't know the
details of what went on," he said.
Of the closed session at which the evaluation occurred, Mr Rosenthal said, "I
don't understand why they chose that process."
Chief Lysaght started work as head of the police department in July 1996,
after leaving his post as second-in-command of the Bristol Police Department.
He and his family moved to Newtown recently.