Date: Fri 12-Feb-1999
Date: Fri 12-Feb-1999
Publication: Bee
Author: CURT
Quick Words:
edink-aquifer-protection
Full Text:
PAGE ONE
In The Cause Of Clean Water
The Planning and Zoning Commission last week invited the public to comment on
its proposed aquifer protection regulations, and they got an earful from local
developers who thought they had gone too far in their efforts to protect the
town's groundwater resources. No one likes to see their options limited,
especially business men and women who have the livelihoods of themselves and
their employees on the line. The proposed aquifer protection regulations would
bring a new set of limits to options for landowners located on the town's
eight square-mile "sole source" aquifer and its recharge area in Newtown and
Sandy Hook.
Everyone involved in this debate, from the staunchest clean water purist to
the most unbending advocate for unfettered enterprise, has to recognize one
underlying reality: Newtown's habit of polluting its groundwater has to
change. From the septic pollution that resulted in a $32.5 million sewer
system to the chemicals in the ground on Appleblossom Lane that forced a $1.5
million water line extension, our collective thoughtlessness in casting our
waste into the environment has come back to haunt us in very expensive ways.
The proposed regulations currently under review in the Planning and Zoning
Commission's public hearing (scheduled to resume on February 25 at 8 pm in
Newtown Middle School) are an attempt to shift Newtown's focus from expensive
cures to prevention. It's not that prevention costs nothing; many of the
developers present at last week's portion of the hearing suggested that this
dose of prevention would cost them plenty. It's just that the costs of
unchecked contamination can be unending and are often imposed not on those who
are responsible, but on those unlucky enough to live in the path of the plumes
of pollution left by others. All too often, the responsible parties are long
gone when it comes time for the clean-up.
As the Planning and Zoning Commission fine-tunes these regulations, it will be
important for it to carefully weigh the concerns of property owners and
developers who will be directly affected by the new rules. Perhaps there are
ways to mitigate the economic effects of the regulations on people with plans
to develop their properties. Perhaps there are instances where prohibited
activities might be allowed but tightly regulated. The bottom line, however,
is that our resolve to stop the pollution of Newtown's largest source of clean
drinking water has to come before the pollution takes place, not after the
fact. The proposed aquifer protection regulations at long last demonstrate
that resolve.