Date: Fri 12-Feb-1999
Date: Fri 12-Feb-1999
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
traffic-safety-P&Z
Full Text:
Neighbors Say Proposed Development Could Pose Traffic Safety Hazards
BY ANDREW GOROSKO
Parmalee Hill Road area residents are warning Planning and Zoning Commission
(P&Z) members that a 13-lot residential subdivision proposed for that area
would increase local traffic flow and pose added safety hazards on that steep,
narrow, winding street.
The P&Z conducted a public hearing March 4 on Daniels Hill Estates, a
subdivision proposed for 40 acres off Parmalee Hill Road by Daniels Hills
Development, LLC. Local builder Michael Burton is a partner in the development
project.
Twelve of the proposed 13 lots would have road frontage on Daniels Hill Road,
a proposed 1,490-foot dead-end street which would extend into the rugged
development site from the west side of Parmalee Hill Road, just north of the
Maybrook Railroad Company train tracks and east of Georges Hill Road. Nine
acres of the site would be designated open space land.
Resident Carol Turoczi of 38 Parmalee Hill Road told P&Z members the proposed
construction would be very disruptive to the landscape and would result in a
traffic burden on Parmalee Hill Road, a street which she termed "extremely,
extremely dangerous right now." She termed the street "one of the town's worst
roads" where large school busses have been banned for 20 years due to
hazardous driving conditions. The proposed construction work would cause
environmental damage in the drainage area leading down to the Housatonic
River, she said.
"When this subdivision is put in...it will change that whole entire area...it
will change everything," she said. "That road is horrendous as it stands at
the moment," she said of Parmalee Hill Road. "This is a brutal piece of land.
It is a horrendous piece of land to build on," she said.
Resident Paul Magnuson of 35 Parmalee Hill Road said the road is exceedingly
difficult in winter. "The whole road is extremely narrow" he said.
Resident Justin Scott of 40 Parmalee Hill Road said "It's a very, very narrow,
twisty road" both to the north and south of the proposed new intersection.
Resident Keats Skill of Parmalee Hill Road said there have been drainage
problems for decades on the narrow Parmalee Hill Road. The passage of heavy
construction equipment over the road will cause it to collapse, he said.
Considerable drainage problems exists to the area south of the proposed
intersection, he said. He urged P&Z members to adequately address drainage
problems before acting on the development proposal.
Resident Paul Carpenter of 19 Parmalee Hill Road said "The whole road is
dangerous. It's been neglected. I can't see why we're putting in new roads
when we can't take care of old roads...It's pathetic."
"I'm against it," he said of the development proposal. "I think somebody needs
to come up with a better plan," he added.
Resident Larry Russell of 53 Parmalee Hill Road wrote a letter to the P&Z on
the development proposal. He wrote, in part, "Like many of Newtown's roads
(Parmalee Hill Road) is narrow, hilly, winding, with virtually no shoulders.
There are several spots that are extremely dangerous due to blind curves,
steep inclines and minimal width. This proposed road may meet minimal planning
and zoning standards but I believe it will exacerbate an existing hazardous
condition on Parmalee Hill Road." Steps should be taken by the town or the
developer to improve visibility problems near the proposed intersection, he
wrote.
Also, the presence of the subdivision may provide easier access for youths who
loiter in two abandoned railroad tunnels beneath Parmalee Hill Road, he added.
Visual Aids
Resident Penny Meek of 40 Butterfield Road presented P&Z members with a
variety of graphics to explain her concerns about the development project.
Ms Meek said the locational map provided by the developers to depict where the
site lies in relation to other existing construction lacks sufficient
information, inadequately describing the area's construction density.
It takes two to three years to build the roadways and houses in a subdivision,
she said, speaking of her experience in living next to Butterfield Woods on
Butterfield Road. Ms Meek suggested that an adequate number of garbage bins
and portable toilets be kept on the development site. She said gravel driveway
aprons should be maintained to control sediment from entering roadways. Ms
Meek asked that nearby residents be given a break from workmen building
subdivisions on weekends. She urged that nearby homeowners have independent
pre-blasting inspections done to determine if blasting on the site causes
damage to their properties. The heavy truck traffic which would travel over
Parmalee Hill Road during construction will damage that road, she said.
"Parmalee Hill Road itself is in horrendous physical condition," she said. The
Daniels Hill Estates site is the last piece of open land in that general area,
she said.
Response
Attorney Bill Denlinger, representing the applicants, told P&Z members
different versions of the development application have been reviewed twice by
the Conservation Commission. "It's been engineered and re-engineered," he
said.
In response to comments made by nearby residents, engineer Larry Edwards,
representing the developers, acknowledged that Parmalee Hill Road is a narrow
road, adding that he understands the residents' concerns.
Mr Edwards acknowledged that many of Ms Meek's comments are valid ones.
The sight line distances for the proposed intersection comply with town
standards, he said. The publicly-owned Parmalee Hill Road doesn't meet the
town's standards for new roads, he said.
Land use regulations don't require the developers to improve Parmalee Hill
Road beyond the area where it will intersect with the proposed Daniels Hill
Road, he said. The proposed development will no have effect on drainage on
Parmalee Hill Road or Georges Hill Road, he said. The proposed work will not
increase the rate of stormwater runoff from the site, he said. A special
device will be affixed to a drain pipe to prevent it from being plugged by the
work of beavers, he said.
Road guardrails would be installed in areas where required along
steeply-sloped sections of Daniels Hill Road, Mr Edwards said. The engineer
said he expects rock ledge will be found in some areas of the development
where it would be used as a natural retaining wall for the landscape.
P&Z members said town land use staff members will review modifications to the
development plans which Mr Edwards had made in response to the staff members'
comments on the development proposal. The public hearing on Daniels Hill
Estates will be continued at an upcoming P&Z session.
Conservation
In December 1997, the Daniels Hill Estates developer applied to the
Conservation Commission to do regulated construction work in wetland and
watercourse areas. The commission conducted public hearings on the application
in February and March 1998, and rejected the application in April 1998. The
developers sued the Conservation Commission in May 1998 in seeking court
approval for the project.
According to the developer's lawsuit, the commission's denial of the
application was based on considerations which weren't part of the public
hearing record, exceeded the commission's powers, and was speculative and
vague.
The developer later submitted a revised wetlands application to Conservation
which gained commission approval last September.