Embrace And Continue To Push DEI
To the Editor:
Progress: On July 7, 2020 the board unanimously approved the diversity & equity resolution that was “a starting point that showed the district’s intention.”
Progress: With a standing ovation, on October 5, 2021, we welcomed and pledged our support of Wesley Johnson, the new diversity, equity, and inclusion coordinator, and on December 21, Mr Johnson defined DEI in a thorough presentation and took questions, some wackier than others.
Progress: The new African American/Black & Puerto Rican/Latino Social Studies program at Newtown High School that will be taught by Rachel Torres.
Progress: On 2/7/2022: A discussion on race cohosted by the Board of Ed and Library where the main question posed was, “What is the one action the Newtown community can take right now to improve diversity, equity and inclusion?” “Conversations like this,” was one answer, which The Newtown Bee reiterated in their February 10 editorial. Another answer stated by the Board of Education chair, was implementing a culturally responsive education.
If that is truly the case, and the chair believes that, then the BOE striking out an administrative goal of recruiting, selecting, and employment of qualified people among racial and ethnic minority groups seems to conflict rather than embrace and continue to push diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.
For those who want to oppose DEI, or question its merit at this position, that is willful ignorance. It has always been about eliminating disparities, not denying the presence of them. Creating an inclusive community where the opportunity to thrive is feasible for all.
During the focus group on the school superintendent search last Wednesday, March 30, parents asked a variety of questions. One question posed to Dr Randall Collins of NESDEC, was the concern for academic achievement and the need to not lose focus on that. He answered by stating that the focus on academic achievement and DEI are not mutually exclusive; a succinct and straightforward answer.
I personally have read and heard many racist dog whistles disguised as differences of opinion. Things like “was the hiring of our DEI coordinator the cause of the recent fight at Newtown High School?”; “Diversity, equity, or whatever...”; and “They are 12% of our population they should get 12% of our attention.”
One of the repeated statements thus far is that “DEI is an oppressive source of disenfranchisement and defamation ... to white males.” As my family has been targeted by racists in this community, I find that insulting and laughable.
As a mother of two young children and former host mother to a foreign exchange student, the BOE remaining committed to the resolution is important to me and should be important to all parents. Stay the course. Being resistant to change is detrimental to the collective growth of our community.
Nerlande Foote
Newtown
‘Recruiting, selecting, and employment of qualified people’ regardless of any other considerations should be the administrative goal. Choose from the best candidates.
The above letter asserts “If that is truly the case, and the chair believes that, then the BOE striking out an administrative goal of recruiting, selecting, and employment of qualified people among racial and ethnic minority groups seems to conflict rather than embrace and continue to push diversity, equity, and inclusion efforts.”
This assertion is incorrect.
As mentioned in the recording below, the BoE unanimously approved two separate policies, Affirmative Action (Federal requirement) and Minority Recruitment and Retention (State requirement). While it is true that other districts have grouped both topics in a single policy, Newtown chose to keep them separate. Unfortunately, the model Affirmative Action policy used still had vestiges of the Minority Reporting policy that were removed.
This was mentioned twice in the April 5 BoE meeting in the recording:
https://viewer.earthchannel.com/PlayerController.aspx?&PGD=newtownct&eID=792, once at timestamp 0:11:30 and again at timestamp 2:46:40.