LUNCH MENU

By LINDA BAUER

Published: Jan 14, 2005 12:00 am

LUNCH MENU

WEEK OF JAN. 17-21

All Newtown

Elementary schools

MONDAY, JANUARY 17

NO SCHOOL

TUESDAY, JANUARY 18

CHOICE ONE:

Spaghetti and Meatballs

Tossed Salad

Fresh Fruit

Milk

WEDNESDAY, JANUARY 19

CHOICE ONE:

Baked Chicken

Mashed Potatoes

Savory Green Beans

Sliced Peaches

Chocolate Pudding

Milk

THURSDAY, JANUARY 20

CHOICE ONE:

Meatball Sub

Carrot Coins

Diced Pears

Milk

FRIDAY, JANUARY 21

CHOICE ONE:Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â

Pyramid Pete Pizza Party

Caesar Salad

Mixed Fruit

Milk

WEEKLY ALTERNATES:

Ham and Cheese Sandwich, âBreadbeakâ Bagel or Peanut Butter &

Â Â Â Â Marshmallow Sandwich

School lunch prices for 2005:

Elementary

$1.90, Double Entree $1.25 additional

Intermediate & Middle School Lunch

$2.05

High School

$2.10, Pizza $2.25, Sandwich Central $2.50,

Breakfast $1.50, Snacks 75Â¢, Ice Cream Novelties 75Â¢, Dixie Cup 50Â¢, Reduced Lunch 40Â¢

Kindergarten

Milk 30Â¢

Year In Review — Jim Taylor

Seeking Newtown’s First Baby Of 2025

Morgan Wright ‘Moose’ Mead, Jr

Stephen M. Macejko, Jr (August 27, 1959-December 19, 2024)

Year In Review: New Additions And Continued Offerings Marked Local Faith Communities

Head on a swivel at all times - especially in grocery parking lots! Keep an eye out for folks turning at the flagpole - it befuddles them at times.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

Log In

LUNCH MENU

Leave a Reply Cancel reply