Volvo Vs Deer

By ANDY GOROSKO

Published: Oct 21, 2005 12:00 am

Volvo Vs Deer

Motorist Valerie Vuto, 19, of Monroe was driving a 1996 Volvo 850 sedan southward on Toddy Hill Road about 7:20 pm October 17, when a deer ran into the road in front of the auto, resulting in a collision, police said.

Vuto was not injured. Police took no enforcement.

Ansonia Man

Police said they stopped motorist Thomas Bennett, 53, of Ansonia on Mile Hill Road about 3 pm October 18 for not wearing a seatbelt. Police said they charged Bennett with failure to wear a seatbelt and with driving without automotive insurance. Police released Bennett on $50 bail for a November 1 court appearance.

Toyota Mishap

Motorist Nicholas Cartwright, 24, of Monroe was driving a 1997 Toyota Camry westward on Meadow Brook Road about 5 pm October 16, when his right front tire hit a pothole, causing the rim to crack and the tire to flatten, police report.

Police investigated the mishap. Cartwright was not injured. Police took no enforcement.

NFA Deep Brook Trail Scouting Day Postponed

Dolores M. Winans

Top Of The Mountain

Global Community Engagement Day Event At C.H. Booth Library

Diaspro Breaks Single-Game 3-Point Record With Seven From Downtown

Head on a swivel at all times - especially in grocery parking lots! Keep an eye out for folks turning at the flagpole - it befuddles them at times.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Volvo Vs Deer

Leave a Reply Cancel reply