Hawk Spikers Return To Winning Ways

By ANDY HUTCHISON

Published: Oct 22, 2010 12:00 am

Newtown High Schoolâs girlsâ volleyball team carried a four-match winning streak into the middle of this weekâs action.

All four wins, over Pomperaug of Southbury, Notre Dame-Fairfield, Brookfield, and Oxford came by 3-0 scores.

Newtown, in its 3-0 (25-8, 25-12, 25-16) win over visiting Brookfield on October 15, got 15 assists from setter Jess Lynch, who helped set up five kills from Emma Herring, four kills from Amanda Rowan, and three kills from Maddy Good.

The Nighthawks got four service aces from Herring, and three from Riley Wurtz. Good, Courtney Escoda and Wurtz all had seven digs.

With the 3-0 (25-8, 25-19, 26-24) win at Oxford on October 18, the Nighthawks improved to 10-3 overall and 8-1 in he South-West Conference.

Herring had six kills and three aces, Rowan contributed seven kills and three aces, and Abbey Doski added nine digs.

The Way We Were

Early Deadlines, Holiday Closings For New Year

Hendrik Bagmeyer

NFA Deep Brook Trail Scouting Day Postponed

Dolores M. Winans

Head on a swivel at all times - especially in grocery parking lots! Keep an eye out for folks turning at the flagpole - it befuddles them at times.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Hawk Spikers Return To Winning Ways

Leave a Reply Cancel reply