Sports

Cross Country Teams Race At Home And Support FAITH Food Pantry

Published: Sep 29, 2024 7:00 am

Newtown High School’s girls’ and boys’ cross country teams had their only home meet of the season as the Nighthawks hosted Bethel and Brookfield for Senior Night on the trails next to Reed School on September 24. Additionally, the squads combined to collect more than 800 items to donate to FAITH Food Pantry.

The girls defeated Bethel 21-34 and beat Brookfield 15-50. Natalie McLean won the race in a time of 21:08. Grace Lyons was third in 21:54, Annabelle Foley fourth in 22:33, Britta Petersen seventh in 23:43, Jessie Moore eighth in 23.49, edging Claire DiNoto who was ninth and also clocked in at 23.49. Lexi Young rounded out Newtown’s top seven by placing 12th in 24:33.

In the boys’ race the Nighthawks defeated Brookfield 26-29 and lost to Bethel 29-26. The first-place runner was Bethel’s Evan Bureau in a time of 16:31. Newtown’s Soheib Dissa placed second in 17:31, Orion Lowery was sixth in 17:59, Ubay Dissa came in ninth in 18:49, Stephen Sibley was 11th in 18:56, Brian Sibley 12th in 19:02, Sebastian Colburn was 20th in 20:07, and Aarav Shetty 21st in 20:11.

The NHS girls' cross country team celebrated Senior Night on September 24. —photo courtesy Christina Caron

The NHS boys celebrated Senior Night at its meet on September 24. —photo courtesy Melissa Massett

Please Drive Safe In 2025

More Than 50 Santas Participate In Run

Meet The Danbury Hat Tricks At C.H. Booth Library

Two Charges For Driver Who Left Scene After Vehicle Struck Dog Twice

‘Newtown's Winter Steeples,’ This Year's Holiday Cover Art

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Cross Country Teams Race At Home And Support FAITH Food Pantry

Leave a Reply Cancel reply