Developing A Consensus On

Fairfield Hills

To the Editor:

The Fairfield Hills campus is not only physically centered in our town, but often seems to be a central focus of many during this political season. This valuable piece of property has been the topic of much discussion and controversy, often times filled with misinformation and untruths twisted to fit one’s own agenda.

I am often angered whenever I read a letter in this column or a quote in an article stating that our town does not plan or work toward a common good. Having served on the Fairfield Hills Master Plan Ad Hoc Committee in 2002/2003 I am keenly aware of the effort of many over several years who spent long hours working on developing a consensus over what to do with this prime property. Our committee held 26 public meetings, listened to 45 community groups, arranged several community workshops, hosted public tours, produced a video for public broadcast, and much more.

Developing a consensus was and is elusive, as many differing opinions exist, with many having a particular idea or want based on their own special interest. The master plan was purposely created with extensive flexibility in order to satisfy as many current as well as future needs. The Fairfield Hills Authority has done a commendable job so far with implementing the first phase of bringing new life and a sense of community to the campus. The grounds are enjoyed daily by many who are casually strolling, dog-walking, biking, horseback riding, participating in sports activities, or visiting the athletic and fitness facility. New underground utilities and drainage systems have been installed, a new park complete with benches and flagpole is finished, and a new municipal center is preparing for business.

Much has changed since 2003, and it is clear that it is time to review the direction we should take for the campus once again. I believe that determining the future of the campus is a huge task, but that it can be accomplished with the right leadership in place. The plan put forth by Gary Fetzer and Joe Hemingway is a good one; build trust, prioritize needs, remove dangerous and unneeded structures, create a vision, and then build consensus. Gary and Joe are very capable of eliminating much of the controversy and politics over this town gem, and helping Newtown work as a team and move forward. This is why I support them and their plan, and serve as their campaign treasurer. We need visionaries, not obstructionists; we need leaders, not naysayers. I urge the voters to carefully consider the options, and join me in supporting them.

Alan Clavette

3 Fox Hollow Lane, Sandy Hook                         September 22, 2009