Edna Court, Brookfield

By GAIL SLUPATCHUK

Published: Sep 21, 2007 12:00 am

Edna Court, Brookfield

Eugene and Caroline Montalto sold their property at 1 Edna Court, Brookfield, to Samuel Townsend, formerly of Vienna, Va.

Dan Kuhn of William Pitt Sothebyâs International Realty Danbury listed and marketed the property, which was sold by Barbara Snyder of Prudential Connecticut Realty.

Attorney Andrew Buzzi of Danbury presented the sellers and attorney Eric DaSilva represented the buyer.

Edwin Lane, Thomaston

Robert and Kelly Senesac sold their property at 22 Edwin Lane, Thomaston, to Terry and Colleen Eichman, former of Weatherford, Texas.

Bethany Lyden of Stone Crest Realty, Thomaston, listed and marketed the property, which was sold by Tim Clark of Coldwell Banker Real Estate, Woodbridge.

Attorney Eric DaSilva represented the sellers and attorney Rick Gilland of Thomaston represented the buyers.

New Lebbon Road

Alexander and Sarah Hoffert sold their property at 25 New Lebbon Road to Ronald Barthel and Angela Townem formerly of Stamford.

Joan Brigilia, ABR, of Coldwell Banker Real Estate listed and marketed the property, which was sold by Howard Dubman of William Raveis Real Estate, Stamford.

Attorney Andrew Buzzi of Danbury represented the sellers and attorney Eric DaSilva represented the buyers.

Nighthawk Wrestling Team Dominates Dual Meet, Shines In Eastern States Classic

Holly Kocet is pushing a false narrative. The facts simply don't bear out any negative impact to the traffic on Mt Pleasant Road. Saying it does , does not make it true. The road handles in excess of 40,000 trip a day. a couple hundred form Castle Hill is negatable.

A Development Must Be A Good Fit

Yea. great decision and it will add to the quality of comments posted.

Finally, The Time Has Come(And Some Reminders)

Not approving a development that has "checked" all the boxes because the NIMBY mob doesn't like it is wrong.

The town historically has strong collaboration with developers, but the primary obstacle arises from community opposition exerting undue influence on the zoning department. This "NIMBY" pressure often leads to project rejections that exceed the department's actual jurisdiction or authority. Consequently, developers face a limited set of options: either engage in expensive legal battles or leverage the Connecticut Affordable Housing Land Use Appeals Procedure (CGS § 8-30g) as a recourse.

Discusses Moratorium

You are correct, Bruce. I know how hard these plans are to put together, but I still believe that we can have more definitive and measurable goals. I know there are a number of units coming online, and the community truly needs them. If only we can move the development of affordable housing to more of a partnership between the community and the developers than the adversarial tug-of-war it seems to be now, that would be good progress.

Log In

Edna Court, Brookfield

Leave a Reply Cancel reply