Log In


Reset Password
Archive

Connecticut Assault Weapons Ban Remains In Effect

Print

Tweet

Text Size


Connecticut Assault Weapons Ban Remains In Effect

HARTFORD (AP) — The end of the national ban on assault weapons will leave Connecticut as one of seven states where those guns will remain illegal.

And gun rights advocates do not expect that to change soon.

“Nothing is going to change here in Connecticut, and I don’t perceive anybody going after the legislature in trying to get rid of the law this year,” said Robert Crook, executive director of the Coalition of Connecticut Sportsmen.

“Maybe next year, maybe the year after, we’ll make an effort to get rid of it,” Mr Crook said.

Connecticut and Massachusetts are the only two New England states with an assault weapons ban on place.

The 1994 federal ban, signed by President Clinton, outlawed 19 types of military-style assault weapons. A clause directed that the ban expire unless Congress specifically reauthorized it, which it did not.

Connecticut passed its own law in 1993. It defined assault weapons and listed semiautomatic firearms that were illegal to sell, transport, or possess in the state. It banned future sales of 63 types of military style weapons. The state law also banned someone from using a combination of parts to convert a firearm into an assault weapon.

Attorney General Richard Blumenthal said Connecticut lawmakers need to renew their resolve to support the state ban.

“Our state must now commit to continued, even stronger enforcement of our assault weapons ban,” Blumenthal said. “We can no longer count on our federal agencies to assist us.”

US Rep Rosa DeLauro, D-Conn., was among those members of Congress who Monday called for the federal ban to be reauthorized.

“Right now we have the federal government recalling the Super Soaker toy gun at the same time we are within hours of letting assault weapons back on our streets,” said Ms DeLauro, during a news conference on Capitol Hill. “The mere notion that we would again legalize these guns is outrageous.”

Rep Christopher Shays, R-Conn., criticized his Republican leaders for refusing to allow the House to debate the ban.

“I am deeply disappointed supporters of the ban in Congress have not been given the chance to express the will of their constituents in an up-or-down vote on the House floor,” said Mr Shays.

State Rep Michael Lawlor, D-West Haven, co-chairman of the legislature’s Judiciary Committee, who helped write the 1993 state legislation, criticized President Bush and Congress for not renewing the ban. He said they should be working to strengthen the law and make it permanent.

“These weapons serve no legitimate civilian or hunting purpose and Connecticut did the right thing by implementing its own law,” Mr Lawlor said.

But Mr Crook said the Connecticut law has had little effect, and has been a burden for police. Mr Crook said there have only been about a dozen prosecutions since 1993, resulting in two convictions. He credits the reduction of gang activity, not the state ban, with the reduction of assault weapon use on Connecticut’s streets.

Some manufacturers of assault weapons have made cosmetic changes to their guns and were able to circumvent the ban, he said.

Mr Crook said the state ban has mostly been “an affront” to the intelligence of gun owners, some of whom like to collect assault weapons or use semiautomatic firearms for target shooting.

“It precludes him from buying an item that he wants,” Mr Crook said. “Some people compare it to ‘you can buy a Ford, but you can’t buy a Corvette.’”

Comments
Comments are open. Be civil.
0 comments

Leave a Reply