Ukrainian Festival Rescheduled To September 25

By SHANNON HICKS

Published: Sep 16, 2011 12:00 am

The 36th annual Ukrainian Festival will be held on Sunday, September 25, at Paproskiâs Castle Hill Farm, 5 Sugar Lane (off Route 302). The festival has been rescheduled from its original date of August 28, when Tropical Storm Irene forced its postponement. It is also a different location than usual for the festival.

The day begins at 11 am with the Divine Liturgy celebrated by Right Reverend Archpriest Mihai Dubovici, pastor of the Protection of the Blessed Virgin Mary Ukrainian Catholic Church of Bridgeport. The church choir will sing the responses.

Ukrainian food â including varenyky (potato dumplings like pyrogies), holubchi (stuffed cabbage), kobassa (kielbasa) and kapucta (sweet fried cabbage) â made by the parish women, under the direction of Taras and Maria Slevinsky, will be available for purchase along with picnic-style food.

A lively program, organized by Roman Stanislawsky, will begin at 2:30 pm. It will consist of ethnic Ukrainian dancing performed by the Kolononka Ukrainian Dance Group of Stamford, and Ukrainian songs performed by Gregory Kylinskyj, Mukola Maksymiuk, Anatolij Krytej and a duet by the Korenovski Sisters. There will also be an exhibit of Ukrainian arts and crafts coordinated by Gloria and Chrystyna Horbaty, and Ukrainian articles for sale.

Other entertainment throughout the day, organized by Stephen and Diana Paproski, include volleyball and horseshoe tournaments, hay rides, corn maze, pony rides, petty zoo, Moon Walk, chess, and a Varenyky Eating Contest.

Admission is $2. There is plenty of free off-street parking, and the festival will be held rain or shine.

For information, call Gloria P. Horbaty (203-269-5909) or Stephen Paproski (203-426-5487).

Please Drive Safe In 2025

More Than 50 Santas Participate In Run

Meet The Danbury Hat Tricks At C.H. Booth Library

Two Charges For Driver Who Left Scene After Vehicle Struck Dog Twice

‘Newtown's Winter Steeples,’ This Year's Holiday Cover Art

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Ukrainian Festival Rescheduled To September 25

Leave a Reply Cancel reply