Date: Fri 27-Nov-1998
Date: Fri 27-Nov-1998
Publication: Bee
Author: CURT
Quick Words:
edink-tobacco-settlement
Full Text:
ED INK: The Tobacco Money
The decision last week by Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal to
join a multi-state settlement with tobacco companies clears the way for $3.5
billion to flow into state coffers. (The deal could grow to $5.5 billion
through inflation over the 25 year term of its implementation.) The settlement
ends a lawsuit Mr Blumenthal filed against the tobacco industry in an attempt
to recover what the state has spent over the years on the medical treatment of
people with tobacco related illnesses.
Connecticut should get its first payment, $44.5 million, next April, and
annual payments of $100 million after that. Mr Blumenthal said he decided to
join with several other states in the settlement "to save lives now and begin
to fairly compensate Connecticut for the horrendous harm done by the tobacco
industry over the years." Implicit in these comments is the idea that the
money will be used for health programs and a campaign to help smokers quit the
habit and to keep young people from lighting up in the first place. This is
what anti-smoking groups have been pushing for. But that is not necessarily
what will happen with the money.
Technically state budgetmakers can do whatever they want with the windfall
from the tobacco settlement. Such a massive influx of cash could solve a lot
of problems for the state, and the temptation to view the $3.5 billion as
"free money" for special interest programs or for tax breaks in election years
will be great.
The governor and state legislators should remember, however, that this is not
free money. It has been paid for in the most painful way by generations of
smokers and their families who have faced suffering and death as a direct
result of the use of tobacco products -- products that have been aggressively
marketed to young and old alike for decades. It was their suffering that
inspired the lawsuits that forced the massive cash pay-outs the tobacco
companies must now make. It should be their suffering that inspires
Connecticut budgetmakers to direct the money coming from the settlement to
programs and causes directly related to the health of Connecticut's citizens.