Date: Fri 23-Apr-1999
Date: Fri 23-Apr-1999
Publication: Bee
Author: STEVEB
Quick Words:
Fairfield-Hills-environment
Full Text:
Wasserman Critical Of Fairfield Hills Environmental Study Delay
BY STEVE BIGHAM
State Rep Julia Wasserman this week expressed her displeasure with the state's
delay in completing an environmental study of the 186-acre core campus of
Fairfield Hills, which is currently for sale.
In a letter to Commissioner Theodore R. Anson of the Department of Public
Works (DPW), Mrs Wasserman said the state's inability to complete the study on
time pushes the sale of the property back even further. The study, which was
supposed to be finished March 8, must be completed before the four prospective
developers can be expected to hand in detailed proposals, which were scheduled
to be in by mid-June. The delay also pushes back the date for when the state
will give Newtown the right-of-first-refusal on the property, giving local
officials more time to study the pros and cons of the purchase.
On Tuesday, the Fairfield Hills Advisory Committee reconvened to discuss the
possible purchase of the Fairfield Hills campus by the town. Over the next
three months, the panel will be called upon to research the issue and make a
recommendation to the Board of Selectmen. The panel will compare the
advantages and drawbacks of private development vs public ownership. Once the
town is offered right-of-first-refusal, it will have 105 days to give the
state a decision.
An Issue Of Communication
Mrs Wasserman also used her letter to express concern over the contaminated
soil and groundwater pollution that remain on a 22.6-acre piece of land at
Fairfield Hills which the state gave to the town in 1997. The state had
removed two underground oil tanks near a garage in that area in 1996. DPW
official Joe Cassidy said last week his agency was aware that some residual
contamination remained and a plan had always been in place to clean it up.
However, the state failed to inform the town of this problem. Needless to say,
town officials were alarmed earlier this month when they were told that
pollution still existed, especially since the state assumed no liability for
the condition of the land once the deed was transferred.
"While I understand that DPW is in the process now of contracting to remove
this contamination, my issue is one of communication," Mrs Wasserman stated.
"Whenever we are dealing with major and sensitive issues, it is important that
your agency communicate their plans to the town and local representatives.
This is especially important in this case because after the tanks were
removed, the site was transferred to the Town of Newtown and the contamination
is now on town property."
Mr Rosenthal received word from Mr Cassidy that the state would take on the
responsibility to clean the site. However, he wants something in writing. This
week, he requested that DPW provide a copy of all current and prior results of
testing performed on town property which was formerly the garage for Fairfield
Hills Hospital. He also requested the state's remediation plan for cleaning
the property, including a time line for completion. In addition, the first
selectman wants a letter from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)
approving DPW's remediation plan.
Once the clean-up is completed, Mr Rosenthal has asked for assurance from DPW
that the contamination has been abated. He has also requested communication
from the DEP, certifying that the property is in compliance.