Date: Fri 22-Jan-1999
Date: Fri 22-Jan-1999
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
Fairfield-Hills-development
Full Text:
Plan Details Emerge From Would-Be Developers Of Fairfield Hills
BY ANDREW GOROSKO
As a joint state-town selection committee sifts through 12 proposals for the
redevelopment of Fairfield Hills, some details are emerging about proposed new
uses for the former state mental institution.
Community Builders of New Haven is one of the firms which has submitted a
general proposal for the redevelopment of the 185-acre core campus at
Fairfield Hills.
Steve Green, director of the Connecticut office of the national development
firm, said much market data would be needed to determine the best future uses
for Fairfield Hills.
There's probably no single use that requires the approximately one million
square feet of enclosed space available, Mr Green said, adding that any
successful redevelopment of the property will require a mixed-use approach.
Mr Green termed Fairfield Hills "a unique piece of property. It's got
incredible buildings and beautiful acreage."
Community Builders has hired a national planning firm to help it determine
suitable uses for the property, he said. Potential uses include retail,
residential, commercial and light industrial, he said.
In order for Community Builders to create a detailed proposal for Fairfield
Hills redevelopment, the firm would have to be placed on the selection
committee's list of finalists for the project, he said.
The firm likes to develop complex projects involving both residential and
commercial elements, Mr Green said. The retail potential of the property is
small, he said.
Community Builders is redeveloping the former Northampton State Hospital in
Northampton, Mass, a project similar to the redevelopment of Fairfield Hills,
except that the buildings at Fairfield Hills are in much better physical
condition than those at the former mental institution in Northampton, he said.
Redeveloping Fairfield Hills would be a staged process, with the property
being put to new uses in phases, Mr Green said. Although it's clear the best
approach to redeveloping the property is putting it to multiple uses, it's
difficult to say exactly what that split of uses would be, he said.
Carl M. Dunham, Jr, a spokesman for York Hunter, Inc, a Manhattan-based
development firm interested in redeveloping Fairfield Hills, said, "I think
it's a wonderful piece [of property] for mixed use. I think the town did very
well with its adaptive reuse rezoning."
The challenge of redeveloping Fairfield Hills is how to reuse the existing
buildings, he said. The challenge will also be successfully intermixing
various new land uses at the site, he said.
The new uses to which the property eventually will be put will be determined
by market factors, he said. Mr Dunham said there are "a wide range of
possibilities" for the property.
Denise Knauer, a spokeswoman for Baker Companies of Pleasantville, N.Y., said,
"Our plans are still in the preliminary stages." Ms Knauer said the firm wants
to reserve any comment on how it would develop Fairfield Hills until, and if,
it is chosen as a semifinalist for the project.
Other Firms, Other Ideas
Among other firms which have discussed their plans, Bruce Becker, an
architect, planner and developer with Becker and Becker Associates of New
Canaan, has said, "We envision a plan that addresses a wide range of community
needs as well as provides market-rate and affordable housing."
The firm has a background in the reuse of historic buildings and would take a
preservationist approach in redeveloping the property. The firm's "mixed-use
residential community" redevelopment concept would cost about $50 million to
implement and could include 400 to 700 apartments, according to Mr Becker.
The redevelopment project would include luxury apartments, as well as
affordable housing. Twenty-five percent of the units would be designated as
affordable housing.
If chosen as the firm to redevelop the property, Becker and Becker would
create a master plan for the property taking into account the needs of the
community. The firm is involved in real estate development, architectural
design and master planning.
Creating dwellings in existing buildings at Fairfield Hills would be the
dominant use of the property. Becker's concept includes a town school, town
offices, a community center and cultural facilities such as a museum and
library. Redeveloping the property would take two to three years.
In another proposal, a group of Waterbury-area investors known as PBC wants to
create a nine-hole golf course and conference center, among other facilities.
PBC's proposal includes a banquet facility, fairground, agricultural center,
theater and arts center. Under PBC's proposal, five major buildings at
Fairfield Hills would be adapted for new uses -- Newtown Hall, Woodbury Hall,
Shelton House, Bridgeport Hall and Stratford Hall, according to PBC spokesman
Patrick Cragin of Newtown.
An expected environmental study into contamination problems at the site will
be a determining factor in whether PBC's proposal is a financially viable one.
Another firm interested in redeveloping Fairfield Hills is Toll Brothers, a
Pennsylvania-based development firm, which is a major builder of luxury homes
nationwide.
Kira McCarron, a Toll Brothers spokeswoman, has declined to provide specifics
on Tolls Bothers' redevelopment concept for Fairfield Hills, but has noted the
primary thrust would involve new residential construction, plus other uses.
For sale at Fairfield Hills as a unit are 16 major buildings, plus others,
including one million square feet of enclosed space. The buildings occupy
about 100 acres of the 185-acre parcel being marketed by the state. The
remaining 85 acres have forests and fields. That land is available for new
uses. No sale price for Fairfield Hills has been set by the state.
While the sale price of the Fairfield Hills is a consideration, greater weight
will be given to evaluating redevelopment proposals based on their economic
impact on the town and state, as well as the proposals' sensitivity to
environmental and historical issues, according to the state Office of Policy
and Management.
The Fairfield Hills Selection Committee is scheduled to name a group of
redevelopment finalists in March. By June, the panel is scheduled to pick a
firm to buy and redevelop Fairfield Hills.