Date: Fri 16-Jul-1999
Date: Fri 16-Jul-1999
Publication: Bee
Author: ANDYG
Quick Words:
Lysaght-police-termination
Full Text:
Attorney Seeks To Expedite Case Against The Police Chief
BY ANDREW GOROSKO
The lawyer representing Police Chief James E. Lysaght, Jr, this week called
for the Police Commission to expedite its preparation of termination charges
against the chief, so that the chief can move swiftly in mounting his defense.
Police Commission members July 6 forced Chief Lysaght from active duty until
pending commission charges of ineffective management against him are resolved
along with the question of the chief's possible dismissal. The commission
placed Chief Lysaght on administrative leave with pay and benefits. The town
attorney is drafting a bill of particulars listing the reasons why Chief
Lysaght should be fired.
Attorney John Kelly, representing Chief Lysaght, said Tuesday the chief has
decided against filing a lawsuit against the town challenging his being placed
on administrative leave. In a letter to the Police Commission last week, Mr
Kelly had written that the chief would seek a "judicial remedy" if he was
placed on administrative leave.
"It would be prohibitively expensive for my client and the town. It would wind
up being a rather lengthy proceeding," Mr Kelly said.
Chief Lysaght hopes the town will soon draft the formal charges against him so
that he can present his defense, Mr Kelly said.
If the Police Commission were to approve such charges by its August 3 meeting,
a termination hearing would start 5 to 10 days after that, Mr Kelly said.
First Selectman Herbert Rosenthal has said a possible termination hearing
might come by early September.
Mr Kelly said he expects a termination hearing would last more than one night
so that Chief Lysaght could present a thorough defense.
"His position is he's played the role of a police chief, not a politician," Mr
Kelly said. Chief Lysaght is anxious for the termination hearing to start, he
added. The chief hopes to show there is "no just cause" to dismiss him, the
attorney said.
"It's basically a philosophical difference" on how to run a police department
that has caused the conflict between the Police Commission and Chief Lysaght,
Mr Kelly said. He added that such philosophical differences are not the basis
for a police chief's dismissal. State law protects police chiefs from being
removed from office for political reasons, the lawyer said.
It would be unfair to the chief for the Police Commission to prolong its
preparation of charges, Mr Kelly said. The lawyer said he expects the charges
against the chief will be more specific than the complaints which were lodged
against him in his highly negative April job performance evaluation.
Getting termination hearings underway promptly would show that the Police
Commission is acting in good faith in handling the dismissal proceedings, Mr
Kelly said.
Police Commission Chairman James Reilly said Wednesday of the town's attorneys
preparing a bill of particulars for a termination hearing, "When the work is
done, it will be done."
"We want this to move as quickly as possible," he said, adding, though that
the Police Commission has not given the attorneys a deadline by which to
formulate the document.
The bill of particulars will be based on the past negative evaluations of
Chief Lysaght's job performance which were written by the commission, he said.
In Chief Lysaght's absence, Captain Michael Kehoe is in charge of the police
department.