Albert J. Cultrera

By LINDA BAUER

Published: Jun 23, 2006 12:00 am

Albert J. Cultrera

US Navy WWII

Veteran

Albert J. âLeeâ Cultrera, 91, husband of Stella (Przybylowicz) Cultrera of Newtown, died June 15 in Danbury Hospital. Mr Cultrera was born in Pittsfield, Mass., on April 13, 1915, a son of Anthony and Lucia Cultrera. He served in the US Navy during World War II.

Mr Cultrera was a longtime employee of Aetna Insurance Company. During his retirement years, he enjoyed laughing with and greeting customers at Town Line Auto Body Shop in Monroe. He also enjoyed being part of the Town Line Auto Body bowling team.

In addition to his wife of 66 years, Mr Cultrera is survived by a daughter, Anita Stern of California; one brother, and one sister.

A Mass of Christian Burial will be celebrated in St Rose of Lima Church, 46 Church Hill Road, Newtown, on Friday, June 23, at 10:30 am. Interment will follow in Resurrection Cemetery. There are no calling hours.

Arrangements were handled by Honan Funeral Home of Newtown.

The Newtown BeeÂ Â Â Â Â Â Â June 23, 2006

Year In Review: A Photo Essay Of 2024 Highlights

Year In Review — Jim Taylor

Seeking Newtown’s First Baby Of 2025

Morgan Wright ‘Moose’ Mead, Jr

Stephen M. Macejko, Jr (August 27, 1959-December 19, 2024)

Head on a swivel at all times - especially in grocery parking lots! Keep an eye out for folks turning at the flagpole - it befuddles them at times.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

<< Jan 2025 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
29	30	31	1	2	3	4
5	6	7	8	9	10	11
12	13	14	15	16	17	18
19	20	21	22	23	24	25
26	27	28	29	30	31	1

Log In

Albert J. Cultrera

Leave a Reply Cancel reply