Lunch Menus - June 18 through 22

By MELISSA MASON

Published: Jun 13, 2001 12:00 am

Lunch Menus - June 18 through 22

Newtown Elementary

Monday, June 18

CHOOSE ONE:

Cheeseburger

Ham & Cheese Grinder

CHOOSE UP TO THREE:

Potato Wedges

Fruit Mix

Milk

Tuesday, June 19

CHOOSE ONE:

Personal Pizza

Chicken Caesar Salad w/Roll

CHOOSE UP TO THREE:

Garden Salad

Chilled Pears

Milk

Wednesday, June 20

CHOOSE ONE:

Bag Lunch

Cream Cheese & Danimals Yogurt

CHOOSE UP TO THREE:

Fresh Apple

Choc. Chip Cookie

Milk

Thursday, June 21

CHOOSE ONE:

Bag Lunch

3 Foot Sub

CHOOSE UP TO THREE:

Pasta Salad

Fresh Orange

Potato Chips

Milk

Friday, June 22

CHOOSE ONE:

Bag Lunch

Turkey & Cheese Wrap

CHOOSE UP TO THREE:

Watermelon

Pretzel

Milk

Hawley Elementary

Monday, June 18

CHOICE ONE:

Meatball Sub

Sweet Corn

Choc. Pudding

Milk

Tuesday, June 19

âOutdoor Barbequeâ

Grilled Hot Dog

Pasta Salad

Potato Salad

Watermelon

Chips

Lemonade

Wednesday, June 20 (Rain Date Picnic)

ONE CHOICE ONLY:

Turkey & Cheese Wrap

Pasta Salad

Brownie

Milk

Thursday, June 21

CHOICE ONE ONLY:

Bagel w/Cereal

Carrot Slims

Melon Wedges

Milk

Friday, June 12

ONE CHOICE ONLY:

3 Foot Sub

Pasta Salad

Fruit Snacks

Milk

CHOICE TWO - June 18 ONLY:

Chef Salad

Roll

Dessert

Milk

Please Drive Safe In 2025

More Than 50 Santas Participate In Run

Meet The Danbury Hat Tricks At C.H. Booth Library

Two Charges For Driver Who Left Scene After Vehicle Struck Dog Twice

‘Newtown's Winter Steeples,’ This Year's Holiday Cover Art

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Lunch Menus - June 18 through 22

Leave a Reply Cancel reply