HAPPY BIRTHDAY

By NANCY CREVIER

Published: May 09, 2008 12:00 am

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

May 5, Tonya Marie Tucker, Age 11

May 6, Tiernan Keane, Age 9

May 8, Madeline Alexandra Mixon, Age 6

May 9, Charlotte Branchflower, Age 5

May 10, Brandon Chieffo, Age 9

May 10, Brielle Chieffo, Age 9

May 10, Colby Fowler, Age 7

May 11, Nathaniel Hoffert, Age 4

May 11, David Lawrence, Age 8

May 12, Cory Robert Spinelli, Age 10

Deadline for the May 16 issue is Tuesday, May 13, at 4 pm. To include your name in The Birthday Cake, send your name, address, phone number, age, and birthday to: Mini Page, The Newtown Bee, PO Box 5503, Newtown CT 06470. To include a photo in the Birthday Album, simply send an ORIGINAL photograph along with the above material. Digital JPG submissions can also be done by e-mail to editor@TheBee.com. Please send photos as an attachment to the email.

Only children through middle school age will be included in the drawing for the cake. Please send names TWO weeks in advance so they may be eligible for the drawing to win the cake for their birthday celebration. Entrants submitted to the birthday listing more than a month after the birth date will not be accepted.

WIN A FREE BIRTHDAY CAKE FROM

LUIGIâS ITALIAN PASTRY -

Every week one name will be drawn from those eligible in The Birthday Cake and will win a FREE cake from Luigiâs Italian Pastry in Trumbull. Last weekâs winner was McKenna Timmons, age 7.

More Than 50 Santas Participate In Run

Meet The Danbury Hat Tricks At C.H. Booth Library

Two Charges For Driver Who Left Scene After Vehicle Struck Dog Twice

‘Newtown's Winter Steeples,’ This Year's Holiday Cover Art

Snapshot: Pastor Zach Kinsman

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

HAPPY BIRTHDAY

Leave a Reply Cancel reply