The dispatchers at Town Hall South report the following fire calls:

By KAAREN VALENTA

Published: May 09, 2003 12:00 am

Thursday, May 1: 5:10 pm, structure fire, Berkshire Road, Sandy Hook, Hook & Ladder, and Hawleyville responded; 5:49 pm structure fire, Patricia Lane, Hawleyville, Hook & Ladder, and Sandy Hook responded; 6:40 pm, first responder, Elm Drive, Hook & Ladder responded.

Friday, May 2: 11:18 am, alarm, no fire, Sand Hill Plaza, 228 South Main Street, Botsford and Hook & Ladder responded; 3:18 pm, alarm, no fire, Sand Hill Plaza, Botsford and Hook & Ladder responded; 8:12 pm, wires down, New Lebbon Road, Botsford responded; 9:43 pm, motor vehicle accident, 6 Queen Street, Hook & Ladder responded; 10:48 pm, first responder, Main Street, Hook & Ladder responded.

Saturday, May 3: 10:34 am, investigation, Riverside Road, Sandy Hook responded.

Sunday, May 4: 7:32 am, alarm, no fire, 17 Church Hill Road, Bob Tendler Realty, Hook & Ladder responded; 6:45 pm, investigation, Stonewall Ridge Road, Dodgingtown responded.

Monday, May 5: 7:37 am, pumping detail, Twist Hill Lane, Hook & Ladder responded.

Tuesday, May 6: 6:40 pm, motor vehicle accident, South Main Street and Huntingtown Road, Botsford responded.

Wednesday, May 7: 9:35 am, alarm, no fire, Old Tavern Road, Dodgingtown, Hawleyville and Hook & Ladder responded; 11:46 pm, carbon monoxide detector, Washbrook Road, Botsford responded; 11:50 investigation, Mt Laurel Road, Sandy Hook responded.

Thursday, May 8: 12:02 am, investigation, Stonewall Ridge Road, Dodgingtown responded; 7:52 am, alarm, no fire, Head Oâ Meadow School, Dodgingtown and Hook & Ladder responded; 9 am, first responder, Newtown High School, Sandy Hook responded.

Diaspro Breaks Single-Game 3-Point Record With Seven From Downtown

Panacea To Play Twixtmas Show At Aquila’s Nest

Global Community Engagement Day Event At C.H. Booth Library

Boys’ Cagers In Midst Of Tough Set Of Games To Start

Hockey Team Skates To 13-0 Win

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

The dispatchers at Town Hall South report the following fire calls:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply