HVEDP Plans Land Use Training Seminar

By SUE EVANUSKA

Published: Apr 24, 2001 12:00 am

DANBURY â The Housatonic Valley Economic Development Partnership (HVEDP) will conduct an Advanced Land Use Training Seminar entitled âEnvironmental and Financial Success for Economic Development 2001.â The program will take place on Thursday evening, May 3, at the West Side Campus of Western Connecticut State University (WCSU) in the Ancell School of Business Class Room Building, Lecture Hall 127.

Registration and refreshments will be at 6:30 pm and the program will run from 7 to 9 pm.

The lecture is presented in conjunction with WCSU and the Housatonic Valley Council of Elected Officials.

Among other things, the lecture will focus on the responsibilities of earth moving for major economic development projects, balancing successful environmental and financial responsibilities, and regulatory compliance at the local, state, and federal levels. In addition, US EPA Stormwater Phases 1 and 2 will be discussed in the program.

The speakers will be John W. Deering, special consultant, land use and development, and John B. Farnham, executive director, associated general contractors of Connecticut. The program is offered free of charge.

Members of municipal boards, commissions, developers, design professionals, mortgage lenders, bonding agencies, real estate, attorneys, elected officials, and the general public are encouraged to attend. Walk-ins are welcomed.

Contact Marilyn Wajert at HVEDP, 203-775-6256, with any questions and to register for the program.

Editorial Ink Drops: Roadside Litter An Unwelcome Spring Tradition

Newtown PD To Participate In Drug Take Back Day, Saturday

Bolinsky & Foncello: State Public Hearing Scheduled for 6 Commerce Road in Newtown

Author Abi Cushman Visits Hawley Elementary School

Anne Murray

While I respect the outcome of the referendum, I’m disappointed by the way this budget was presented and passed. A 6.72% tax increase and a mill rate jump to 28.78 may have been framed as “just a few dollars a day,” but for many families in town — especially those already stretched thin — those “few dollars” add up quickly. It’s frustrating to see large increases minimized in this way, and I worry that next year we’ll hear, “It’s only a little more than last year,” as if that justifies an ongoing trend of rising taxes. This year’s combined municipal and education budgets total over $141 million — that’s a significant sum.

Everything Passes: Budgets, Capital Projects Referendum Results In

All of the referendums deserve to be pasted. We have a history of deferring needed maintenance and then paying more years later. These are required to keep our town owned building and roads in working condition.

Vote “Yes” To Question #5 On Referendum

Every vote matters and that’s exactly why it’s important to recognize that voting No on a proposed budget is not a vote against Newtown, but rather a vote for accountability, transparency, and fiscal responsibility. Last year, when voters rejected the education budget in its first round, it wasn’t just a symbolic gesture—it resulted in a reduced spending plan that ultimately passed. That outcome showed that our voices can and do make a difference. Voting “No” is one of the few tools residents have to encourage our town leaders to re-evaluate spending, find creative solutions, and prioritize needs over wants. So yes, please vote on April 22—but don’t be afraid to vote “No” if you believe we can do better. Last year’s vote proved that when residents speak up, real changes can follow.

Get Out And Vote

Breaking the tax increase down to a “cost per day” may make it sound more palatable, but it minimizes the real impact these increases have—especially on those already struggling with rising costs across the board. A dollar here and a dollar there adds up, and for many families, it's not just about the price of a cup of coffee—it's about stretching every dollar to cover groceries, fuel, healthcare, and housing. A 6.72% property tax increase is significant, regardless of how it’s framed. Saying “it’s only $1.13 a day” overlooks the fact that for some residents, every expense matters. Just because costs are rising doesn’t mean the burden should automatically fall on taxpayers without exploring real efficiencies, cost savings, or long-term planning. We need to prioritize fiscal responsibility and find smarter ways to manage our town’s needs without assuming residents can or should absorb another round of tax hikes.

Is Our Community Worth $1.67 Per Day?

Let’s have the library present a 20-year, 40-year, and 60-year OPEX/capital investment plan to determine whether this is truly a sustainable investment or just another sunk cost fallacy. Two of the items we’re voting on next week were originally framed as “donations,” yet they continue to cost this town more money over time. It’s time to say no, and force a serious reevaluation of how we approach these decisions.

Quiz Time

<< Apr 2025 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
30	31	1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	1	2	3

Log In

HVEDP Plans Land Use Training Seminar

Leave a Reply Cancel reply