The dispatchers at the emergency communications center at Town Hall South report the following fire calls:

By ANDY GOROSKO

Published: Apr 18, 2008 12:00 am

Thursday, April 10: 9:28 am, motor vehicle accident, near 84 Flat Swamp Road, Dodgingtown responded; 9:35 am, medical assist, 139 Toddy Hill Road, Botsford responded; 1:49 pm, motor vehicle accident, I-84, Hawleyville responded; 7:45 pm, smoke investigation, West Street, Hook & Ladder, Dodgingtown, and Sandy Hook responded.

Friday, April 11: 9:20 am, smoke investigation, Alberts Hill Road, Sandy Hook responded; 2:54 pm, house fire, 3 Oak Drive, Sandy Hook, Hook & Ladder, Hawleyville, and Dodgingtown responded; 5:08 pm, brush fire, Scudder Road, Dodgingtown and Hook & Ladder responded.

Saturday, April 12: 7:43 am, investigation, 3 Nunnawauk Road, Hook & Ladder responded; 3:40 pm, motor vehicle accident, Castle Meadow Road, Botsford responded; 4:23 pm, investigation, Prospect Drive, Hook & Ladder responded; 5:17 pm, medical assist, 55 Farrell Road, Hawleyville responded; 8 pm, chimney fire, 195 Hattertown Road, Dodgingtown and Hook & Ladder responded.

Sunday, April 13: 10:58 am, medical assist, 3 Shamrock Lane, Botsford responded; 1:02 pm, brush fire, Butterfield Road, Hawleyville responded; 1:35 pm, alarm, 77 Cedar Hill Road, Hook & Ladder responded.

Monday, April 14: 7:33 am, smoke investigation, Bennetts Bridge Road, Sandy Hook responded; 11:45 am, motor vehicle accident, near 178 South Main Street, Botsford responded; 3:10 pm, car fire, Philo Curtis Road, Sandy Hook and Hook & Ladder responded; 6:30 pm, motor vehicle accident, I-84, Hawleyville responded.

Tuesday, April 15: 10:43 am, alarm, 77 Cedar Hill Road, Botsford and Hook & Ladder responded; 2:11 pm, brush fire, I-84, Sandy Hook and Hook & Ladder responded; 10:55 pm, smoke investigation, near 123 South Main Street, Hook & Ladder responded.

Wednesday, April 16: 12:59 pm, brush fire, I-84, Hawleyville and Hook & Ladder responded; 4:31 pm, brush fire, near 36 Old Hawleyville Road, Hawleyville and Hook & Ladder responded; 7:54 pm, wires down, near 53 Scudder Road, Dodgingtown responded.Â

Morgan Wright ‘Moose’ Mead, Jr

Stephen M. Macejko, Jr (August 27, 1959-December 19, 2024)

Year In Review: New Additions And Continued Offerings Marked Local Faith Communities

Snapshot: Angelo Marini

Year In Review: Highlighting Community In 2024

Head on a swivel at all times - especially in grocery parking lots! Keep an eye out for folks turning at the flagpole - it befuddles them at times.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

The dispatchers at the emergency communications center at Town Hall South report the following fire calls:

Leave a Reply Cancel reply