Helen Bartko of Anthem, Ariz., to Denise George of Newtown, residential property at 233 Hattertown Road for $329,600. Denise George of Newtown to Carols De Almeida of Sandy Hook, residential property at 14 Greenbriar Lane for $310,000. The estate of

By KENDRA BOBOWICK

Published: Mar 07, 2008 12:00 am

Helen Bartko of Anthem, Ariz., to Denise George of Newtown, residential property at 233 Hattertown Road for $329,600. Denise George of Newtown to Carols De Almeida of Sandy Hook, residential property at 14 Greenbriar Lane for $310,000. The estate of Ann E. Hamann of Southbury to Iroquois Gas Transmission Systems LP of Shelton, residential property at 17 Kale Davis Road for $305,000.

The estate of Richard Alfred Hamann of Southbury to Iroquois Gas Transmission System LP of Shelton, residential property at 17 Kale Davis Road for $305,000. Pamela K. Pearl of Newtown to Teraszkiewicz (no other information listed) of Armonk, N.Y., residential property at 3 Timber Lane for $349,495. Mac Construction LLC of Stratford to Sindo Candella of Orange, residential property at 12 Nighthawk Lane for $900,000. Richard C. Jr and Diana B. Query of Surf Side Beach, S.C., to Adam and Hillary Lewis of Sandy Hook, residential property at 1 Patriot Ridge Road for $525,000.

Deutsche Bank National Trust Co of Santa Ana, Calif., to Ahmed M. Ahsan of Newtown, residential property at 3 Pocono Road for $360,000. GPM Enterprises LLC of Bridgeport to Elisabeta Varga of Oxford, residential property at 31 Laurel Trail for $110,000. David Bell and Theresa M. Berutti Bell of Norwell, Mass., to Zane F. and Janice L. Dicker of Mount Kisco, N.Y., residential property at 26 Farm Field Ridge Road for $492,500.

Meet The Danbury Hat Tricks At C.H. Booth Library

Two Charges For Driver Who Left Scene After Vehicle Struck Dog Twice

‘Newtown's Winter Steeples,’ This Year's Holiday Cover Art

Snapshot: Pastor Zach Kinsman

Fire Reports | December 11-December 16, 2024

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Helen Bartko of Anthem, Ariz., to Denise George of Newtown, residential property at 233 Hattertown Road for $329,600. Denise George of Newtown to Carols De Almeida of Sandy Hook, residential property at 14 Greenbriar Lane for $310,000. The estate of

Leave a Reply Cancel reply