Stuart Drive

By LINDA BAUER

Published: Jan 20, 2006 12:00 am

Stuart Drive

Antoine Mohigel purchased a home on 6 Stuart Drive from Erik and Julie Ingenohl.

Sandi Czaplicke with Coldwell Banker Bob Tendler Real Estate was the listing agent while Lee Boyle, also with Coldwell Banker Bob Tendler Real Estate, was the selling agent.

Attorney Michael Nahoum of Newtown represented the sellers while attorney Richard Bepko of Bridgeport represented the buyer.

Jo Mar Drive

Anne and Rock Kearney purchased a home on 31 Jo Mar Drive from Laura and Todd Brophy.

Doreen Kostecki, GRI, CRS, with Coldwell Banker Bob Tendler Real Estate was the listing agent while Rob Drakeley with Joyce S. Drakeley Realtors was the selling agent.

Attorney Joe Romanello of Danbury represented the sellers and attorney Anthony Bournazos of Danbury represented the buyers.

Mountain View Road, Brookfield

Claire and Clotilda Sepe purchased 19 Mountain View Road, Brookfield, from Marjorie and James Layment.

Lori DeJulio of William Pitt Sothebyâs International realty listed the property, which was sold by Cheryl Schalkhan of Production Real Estate Company.

Attorney Joseph Saffi of Danbury represented the sellers and attorney Doug Lewis of Bethel represented the buyers.

Marlin Road

Blakeman Construction, LLC sold the home at Lot #51 Marlin Road, to Margaret and Chris Mixon, formerly of Oviedo, Fla.

Susan McNulty of Flagpole Realty, Inc sold the property, which was listed by Susan Coyle of Real Estate Two.

Attorney Ward J. Mazzucco of Danbury represented the buyers and attorney Matthew Reale of Shelton represented the seller.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

More Than 50 Santas Participate In Run

Meet The Danbury Hat Tricks At C.H. Booth Library

Two Charges For Driver Who Left Scene After Vehicle Struck Dog Twice

‘Newtown's Winter Steeples,’ This Year's Holiday Cover Art

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

The town should certainly measure its performance against the statewide strategies. Unless I missed it I only know of one small cluster of homes that would meet the affordable housing program. Given the 500 or so new units being added in the last 10 years I think that 4/500 would not meet the metric to allow for a moratorium. I mean, fingers crossed for a Christmas miracle but I suspect we will see a few 8-30's sent our way in a method to avoid the Nimby mob. Thanks, Nimby mob.

Discusses Affordable Housing

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

Stuart Drive

Leave a Reply Cancel reply