LUNCH MENU WEEK Of September 21-25

By GAIL SLUPATCHUK

Published: Sep 18, 2009 12:00 am

LUNCH MENU WEEK Of September 21â25

Newtown Elementary SCHOOLS

MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 21

CHOICE ONE:

Waffle Sticks

Syrup

Sausage

Hash brown patty

Apple

Milk

TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 22

CHOICE ONE:

Sloppy Joe on a bun

Corn on the cob

Fruit cocktail

Milk

WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 23

CHOICE ONE:

Baked breaded chicken nuggets

Cheesy macaroni

Broccoli

Orange

Alternate veggie: Fresh cut bell peppers with dip

Milk

THURSDAY, SEPTEMBER 24

CHOICE ONE:

Beef taco, shredded cheese, lettuce, tomato

Salsa made w/fresh tomatoes

Hawley substitute:

Nachos, beef, cheese, sauce,

Fiesta Rice

Corn

Fruit selection

Milk

FRIDAY, SEPTEMBER 25

CHOICE ONE:

Cheese pizza

Cucumber slices with ranch dip

Fruit selection

Milk

WEEKLY ALTERNATES: (B) Tuna salad on a roll, vegetable pasta salad, carrot sticks, apple & milk (C) Bagel & yogurt fun lunch, or (D) Peanut butter d& jelly sandwich

Morgan Wright ‘Moose’ Mead, Jr

Stephen M. Macejko, Jr (August 27, 1959-December 19, 2024)

Year In Review: New Additions And Continued Offerings Marked Local Faith Communities

Snapshot: Angelo Marini

Year In Review: Highlighting Community In 2024

Head on a swivel at all times - especially in grocery parking lots! Keep an eye out for folks turning at the flagpole - it befuddles them at times.

Please Drive Safe In 2025

How do you propose tapping the brakes, Dave? 8-30g already trumps any local regulations- you don't have a brake pedal to push. Brookfield, Trumbull and now Ridgefield have a clear case for a moratorium based on the development (thanks to 8-30g) that has already occurred. I don't see a clear case for Newtown to request a moratorium... yet.

Backs Moratorium On Dense Development Applications

Nobody is suggesting shutting the doors on new neighbors. What neighboring towns are doing, and what we should be doing too, is to tap the brakes on all of the multi-family residential development proposals so that we can spend 6 months updating our regulations such that if you want to build dense residential housing here, XX percent of it needs to be affordable (we will never make any headway on increasing our percentage of affordable housing otherwise, short of 8-30g), and the rest needs to be done in as low an impact manner as possible. Low impact on traffic, health & safety, the environment and on the cost of town services.

Hey, there you go! Richard solved it. Thanks, that seems so easy- we'll just get rid of the 2nd amendment and the Supreme Court. Seriously, the 2nd amendment doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The Supreme Court doesn't create violent criminals or mental illness. The problem is not the tools, but the criminals & the mental illness. The state of Connecticut seems to be focused on the tools, like Richard, while ignoring the users of those tools.

Why Gun Violence Is Higher In The US

Ned, please familarize yourself with 8-30G, and then please share the unique flaws that may be helpful in formulating a denial An 8-30g project can be denied only on very narrow grounds – i.e., if it presents health, safety or other concerns that exceed a town’s need for affordable housing. According to the TOG website, “projects cannot be rejected for incompatibility with a Town’s Plan of Conservation and Development (POCD); density; traffic congestion; height; aesthetics; concerns of neighbors or the community; and failure to comply with local zoning regulations.” 8-30g proposals are rarely denied by planning and zoning officials because the burden of proof on appeal is on the town. Appeals are costly, but a municipality can be successful in a court case if it has sufficiently established that the concerns leading to denial are factual and substantive.

P&Z Should Reject Vessel Proposal

<< Dec 2024 >>
S	M	T	W	T	F	S
1	2	3	4	5	6	7
8	9	10	11	12	13	14
15	16	17	18	19	20	21
22	23	24	25	26	27	28
29	30	31	1	2	3	4

Log In

LUNCH MENU WEEK Of September 21-25

Leave a Reply Cancel reply